Horton v. Smelser
This text of 5 Blackf. 428 (Horton v. Smelser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The second and third pleas are not objectionable for the cause assigned by the demurrers. Brown v. Connelly, decided at this term. But they are insufficient on other grounds. • The second is bad, because the facts constituting the probable cause are not set out; and the third is defective, because the facts stated do not show probable cause. The demurrers to those pleas were therefore well founded. •
The decision against the plaintiff, on the ground that the [430]*430declaration is bad, is erroneous. The first count is unobjectionable, and that, as the case- stands, is sufficient for the plaintiff.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 428, 1840 Ind. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-smelser-ind-1840.