Horton v. Prendergast
278 U.S. 579, 49 S. Ct. 177
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Offield v. New York, New Haven and Hartford R. R., 203 U. S. 372, 375; Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co., 240 U. S. 30, 32.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horton v. Prendergast, 278 U.S. 579, 49 S. Ct. 177 (1929).
278 U.S. 579 (Horton v. Prendergast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re City of New York
46 Misc. 2d 558 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Manning v. Metropolitan District Commission
169 N.E. 910 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)