Horton v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank

219 A.D. 802
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horton v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D. 743

Opinion

On reargument, order granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and judgment entered pursuant to such order, reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint upon payment of costs to date. As the pleadings stand, there was no issue of fact raised and the attempt to set up an entirely different [803]*803cause of action in the reply to the defendant’s counterclaim, was in fact the stating of a new cause of action inconsistent with that stated in the complaint. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank, 219 A.D. 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

219 A.D. 802 (Horton v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.