Horton v. Horton
2 Cow. 589
Opinion
were of this opinion. They remarked that if the slightest suspicion had appeared, that the privilege which the jury had taken had been, abused to the injury of the party, the verdict should be set aside, but none such was shown or even insinuated.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horton v. Horton, 2 Cow. 589 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
2 Cow. 589 (Horton v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mowry
43 A. 871 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1899)
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Monaghan
30 N.E. 869 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Mahoney v. Decker
25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 365 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)
Evans v. Foss
49 N.H. 490 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1870)
Nims v. Bigelow
44 N.H. 376 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Cook v. Walters
4 Iowa 72 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)
Reynolds v. Champlain Transportation Co.
9 How. Pr. 7 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
State v. Camp
23 Vt. 551 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1851)