Horton v. . Horton

190 S.E. 216, 211 N.C. 390, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 99
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 17, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record does not disclose what admissions, if any, were made at the hearing in the court below, and there being no waiver of jury trial or agreement as to facts nor evidence offered, the court was without power to decide a controverted issue of fact raised by the plead *391 ings. Doubtless tbe effort to end an unseemly controversy between members of tbe same family led tbe learned judge into error.

Tbe case must be remanded for tbe proper determination of tbe material issues.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. . Horton, 190 S.E. 216, 211 N.C. 390, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 99 (N.C. 1937).

190 S.E. 216 (Horton v. . Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. Johnson
165 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)