Horton v. Eischen

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided June 3, 2025·No. 0:25-cv-00839·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Donovan Orville Horton, Case No. 25-CV-839 (PJS/JFD)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen et al.,

Respondents.

The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. No. 7.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is ADOPTED; 2. The Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Dkt. No. 5) is DENIED as moot; and 3. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: June 3, 2025 /s/ Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz United States Chief District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. Eischen, (mnd 2025).

Horton v. Eischen (Horton v. Eischen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related