Horton v. Eischen
This text of Horton v. Eischen (Horton v. Eischen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Donovan Orville Horton, Case No. 25-CV-839 (PJS/JFD)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen et al.,
Respondents.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. No. 7.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is ADOPTED; 2. The Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Dkt. No. 5) is DENIED as moot; and 3. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: June 3, 2025 /s/ Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz United States Chief District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Horton v. Eischen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-eischen-mnd-2025.