Horton v. Donley

Fourth Circuit

Horton v. Donley

367 F. App'x 400

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2010·No. No. 09-2151·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John D. Horton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Horton’s Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Horton v. Donley, No. 3:07-cv-02316-MBS, 2009 WL 2782226 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John D. Horton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Horton’s Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Horton v. Donley, No. 3:07-cv-02316-MBS, 2009 WL 2782226 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Horton v. Donley, 367 F. App'x 400 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

367 F. App'x 400 (Horton v. Donley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.