Horton v. Davis

181 S.E.2d 781, 11 N.C. App. 592, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1592
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJune 23, 1971
DocketNo. 7118SC256
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 181 S.E.2d 781 (Horton v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horton v. Davis, 181 S.E.2d 781, 11 N.C. App. 592, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1592 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Counsel for plaintiff was diligent in obtaining an order extending the time within which appellant was required to serve his case on appeal. However, no motion was made nor order entered for an extension of the time for docketing the record on appeal. The judgment was entered on 23 October 1970. The record on appeal was not docketed in this Court until 19 February 1971 — well beyond the 90-day period provided by Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals. For failure to comply with the Rules of this Court, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Brock and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. McNeil
190 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Hunt
188 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Keyes v. Hardin Oil Co.
186 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 S.E.2d 781, 11 N.C. App. 592, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-davis-ncctapp-1971.