Horton v. City of Taunton

97 Mass. 266
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Chapman, J.

This case was considered by the court in connection with Titus v. Northbridge ; and the two cases must be governed by the same principle. In this case the horse became frightened by a pile of stones on the east side of a small bridge and on the south side of the travelled path. He was within a few feet of the stones. He suddenly backed across the bridge. On the west side of the bridge a railing extended along the north side of the travelled path for several rods. Beyond this railing there was an embankment not protected by a railing. The horse continued to back the wagon till it reached the unprotected place beyond the railing, and there precipitated the wagon and himself over the embankment. He must have backed the wagon a distance of several rods after he became uncontrollable, and his uncontrollable force brought the wagon and himself into connection with the defect.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. City of Taunton, 97 Mass. 266 (Mass. 1867).

97 Mass. 266 (Horton v. City of Taunton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Igo v. City of Cambridge
95 N.E. 557 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Joseph St. Germain v. City of Fall River
59 N.E. 447 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Hungerman v. City of Wheeling
34 S.E. 778 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1899)
Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Westlake
23 Colo. 26 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1896)
Rohrbough v. Barbour County Court
20 S.E. 565 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1894)
Schaeffer v. Jackson Township
24 A. 629 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)
Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Winslow
74 Me. 528 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1883)
Darling v. Westmoreland
52 N.H. 401 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)
Morse v. Town of Richmond
41 Vt. 435 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1868)