Horton v. City of Houston

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horton v. City of Houston. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 F. App'x 903
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2004·No. 03-20450·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit March 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20450

ROBERT HORTON; NATIONALIST TELEVISION, a Texas Non-Profit Corporation; BARRY HACKNEY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

VERSUS

CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS; ACCESS HOUSTON CABLE CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas H-92-CV-3451

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record created on remand and considering

the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we are satisfied

that the district court properly carried out our remand

instructions. We also conclude that the district court did not err

in concluding that the fee in question was narrowly tailored to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. achieve the legitimate objective of promoting localism. We

therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. City of Houston, (5th Cir. 2004).

Horton v. City of Houston (Horton v. City of Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.