Horton v. City of Columbia
This text of Horton v. City of Columbia (Horton v. City of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Tynaysha Horton, Petitioner,
v.
City of Columbia, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001070
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Richland County
Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 27540
Heard June 17, 2015 – Filed July 1, 2015
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
John S. Nichols and Blake Alexander Hewitt, both of Bluestein Nichols Thompson & Delgado, LLC, James E. Smith, Jr. and Dylan W. Goff, both of James E. Smith, Jr., P.A., all of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Dana M. Thye, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' opinion in Horton v. City of Columbia, 408 S.C. 27, 757 S.E.2d 537 (2014). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted and further direct the court of appeals to depublish its opinion and assign the matter an unpublished opinion number. The above opinion shall no longer have any precedential effect.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Horton v. City of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-city-of-columbia-sc-2015.