Horton v. A. I. Namm & Son

231 A.D. 735

This text of 231 A.D. 735 (Horton v. A. I. Namm & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horton v. A. I. Namm & Son, 231 A.D. 735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. No actionable negligence is shown in this record. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-a-i-namm-son-nyappdiv-1930.