Horstkotter v. . Syracuse and Suburban Railroad Company
88 N.E. 1121, 194 N.Y. 599, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1450
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., and Haight, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horstkotter v. . Syracuse and Suburban Railroad Company, 88 N.E. 1121, 194 N.Y. 599, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1450 (N.Y. 1909).
88 N.E. 1121 (Horstkotter v. . Syracuse and Suburban Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.