Horst v. Horst
This text of 2019 ND 93 (Horst v. Horst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶1] Charlotte Horst appeals from a third amended judgment awarding a divorce and establishing primary residential responsibility, child support and parenting time of two minor children. Charlotte Horst argues the district court erred in analysis of the best interest factors relating to parenting time and primary residential responsibility, abused its discretion in denying appointed counsel, and improperly disregarded a request for an annulment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3) and (4).
[¶2] Charlotte Horst attempts to raise various constitutional and other claims, which we do not consider because her arguments were inadequately articulated, supported, and briefed.
State v. Noack
,
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 93, 925 N.W.2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horst-v-horst-nd-2019.