Horst (Tara) Vs. State
This text of Horst (Tara) Vs. State (Horst (Tara) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TARA LYNN HORST, No. 81150 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILE MAY 2 9 2020 EUZABEN A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY S Sr OEPUTY1A 3Lirl' ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Valerie Adair, Judge. This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on November 26, 2019. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until April 9, 2020, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
, J. ,J Hardesty Cadish
Suparme CouRT cc NEVADA
(0) 1947A 41/Pr. ao -.20351' cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Tara Lynn Horst Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
2 i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Horst (Tara) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horst-tara-vs-state-nev-2020.