Horsham Township Council v. Mintz

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Horsham Township Council v. Mintz

395 A.2d 677, 39 Pa. Commw. 408, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1547

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 26, 1978

DocketAppeal, No. 567 C.D. 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 395 A.2d 677 (Horsham Township Council v. Mintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horsham Township Council v. Mintz, 395 A.2d 677, 39 Pa. Commw. 408, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1547 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Menoer,

The council and manager of Horsham Township, Montgomery County (appellants) have appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County directing them to process a conditional [410]*410use application filed by Ronald S. Mintz and Philip Miller, in accord with Horsham Township Ordinance No. 1089. Appellants were also ordered to terminate proceedings initiated pursuant to the Horsham Township Home Rule Charter providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 1089 or, if not repealed, submission of the issue of whether to repeal the ordinance to the electorate.

This appeal presents the issue as to whether a provision of a home rule charter by which a petition may be filed requiring the governing body of the municipality to determine whether or not to repeal a municipal ordinance and, if not so repealed, placing the repeal issue before the electorate may be applied to ordinances relating to land use planning and zoning. The court below concluded that such a referendum provision of a home rule charter was not applicable to ordinances relating to land use planning and zoning.

"We have carefully reviewed the authorities cited and the arguments advanced in this appeal and do hereby affirm the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County on the able opinion of Judge Stanziani written for that court and reported at 102 Montg. Co. L.R. 314 (1977). See Williams v. Rowe, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 537, 283 A.2d 881 (1971).

Order

And Now, this 26th day of December, 1978, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, dated February 16, 1977, as amended March 9, 1977, directing the appellants herein to process a certain conditional use application filed by Ronald S. Mintz and Philip Miller and to cease proceedings initiated pursuant to Section 502 of the Horsham Township Home Rule Charter relative to Horsham Township Ordinance No. 1089, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Menoer,

The council and manager of Horsham Township, Montgomery County (appellants) have appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County directing them to process a conditional [410]*410use application filed by Ronald S. Mintz and Philip Miller, in accord with Horsham Township Ordinance No. 1089. Appellants were also ordered to terminate proceedings initiated pursuant to the Horsham Township Home Rule Charter providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 1089 or, if not repealed, submission of the issue of whether to repeal the ordinance to the electorate.

This appeal presents the issue as to whether a provision of a home rule charter by which a petition may be filed requiring the governing body of the municipality to determine whether or not to repeal a municipal ordinance and, if not so repealed, placing the repeal issue before the electorate may be applied to ordinances relating to land use planning and zoning. The court below concluded that such a referendum provision of a home rule charter was not applicable to ordinances relating to land use planning and zoning.

"We have carefully reviewed the authorities cited and the arguments advanced in this appeal and do hereby affirm the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County on the able opinion of Judge Stanziani written for that court and reported at 102 Montg. Co. L.R. 314 (1977). See Williams v. Rowe, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 537, 283 A.2d 881 (1971).

Order

And Now, this 26th day of December, 1978, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, dated February 16, 1977, as amended March 9, 1977, directing the appellants herein to process a certain conditional use application filed by Ronald S. Mintz and Philip Miller and to cease proceedings initiated pursuant to Section 502 of the Horsham Township Home Rule Charter relative to Horsham Township Ordinance No. 1089, is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 A.2d 677, 39 Pa. Commw. 408, 1978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horsham-township-council-v-mintz-pacommwct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack