Horsford v. Pamunkey Regional Jail

Fourth Circuit

Horsford v. Pamunkey Regional Jail

506 F. App'x 211

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2013·No. No. 12-7974·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Duran Eugene Horsford appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Horsford v. Pamunkey Reg’l Jail, No. 3:12-cv-00447-JRS (E.D.Va. Nov. 7, 2012). [212] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Duran Eugene Horsford appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Horsford v. Pamunkey Reg’l Jail, No. 3:12-cv-00447-JRS (E.D.Va. Nov. 7, 2012). [212] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Horsford v. Pamunkey Regional Jail, 506 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

506 F. App'x 211 (Horsford v. Pamunkey Regional Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related