Horsford v. Bacott

New York Court of Appeals

Horsford v. Bacott

864 N.E.2d 615, 8 N.Y.3d 874

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 22, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 864 N.E.2d 615 (Horsford v. Bacott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horsford v. Bacott, 864 N.E.2d 615, 8 N.Y.3d 874 (N.Y. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that the factual determination on which the Civil Court judgment was based is supported by sufficient evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that the factual determination on which the Civil Court judgment was based is supported by sufficient evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

864 N.E.2d 615, 8 N.Y.3d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horsford-v-bacott-ny-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack