Horsey v. United States Department of State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horsey v. United States Department of State. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 F. Supp. 3d 256
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 28, 2016·No. Civil Action No. 2014-1568·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

JOHN E. HORSEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 14-cv-1568 (KBJ)

)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 19, 2016, the defendants in this matter filed a motion to dismiss

plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 28.) The Court advised the plaintiff of his

obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court

to respond to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to

the motion by October 4, 2016, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. (ECF No.

29.) To date, the plaintiff has neither filed an opposition to the motion nor has

requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT the defendants’

motion as conceded and will DISMISS this action without prejudice.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: October 28, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horsey v. United States Department of State, (D.D.C. 2016).

Horsey v. United States Department of State (Horsey v. United States Department of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.