Horsey v. Salisbury Police Department

575 F. App'x 100
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2014
DocketNo. 14-6202
StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 100 (Horsey v. Salisbury Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horsey v. Salisbury Police Department, 575 F. App'x 100 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Rashaan Horsey, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice after concluding that his claims for damages were barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and that his claims for injunctive relief were not otherwise cognizable. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Horsey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Horsey has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F. App'x 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horsey-v-salisbury-police-department-ca4-2014.