Horsey v. Salisbury Police Department

575 F. App'x 100
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2014·No. No. 14-6202·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Rashaan Horsey, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice after concluding that his claims for damages were barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and that his claims for injunctive relief were not otherwise cognizable. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Horsey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Horsey has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horsey v. Salisbury Police Department, 575 F. App'x 100 (4th Cir. 2014).

575 F. App'x 100 (Horsey v. Salisbury Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)