H.O.R.S.E. of Connecticut, Inc. v. Town of Washington

754 A.2d 161, 253 Conn. 911, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 180
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 18, 2000·No. SC 16313·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 41 (AC 18353), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) there were no material facts in dispute regarding whether the plaintiffs property is used exclusively for charitable purposes under General Statutes § 12-81 (7); and (2) even if there were no such facts in dispute, as a matter of law the plaintiff is a charitable organization under § 12-81 (7), and uses its property exclusively for charitable purposes?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Jeffrey J. Tirdey, in opposition. Decided May 18, 2000

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H.O.R.S.E. of Connecticut, Inc. v. Town of Washington, 754 A.2d 161, 253 Conn. 911, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 180 (Colo. 2000).

754 A.2d 161 (H.O.R.S.E. of Connecticut, Inc. v. Town of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H.O.R.S.E. of Connecticut, Inc. v. Town of Washington
783 A.2d 993 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Dreher v. Joseph
759 A.2d 114 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
Topazio v. Cornerstone of Eagle Hill, No. Cv 970137269 S (Aug. 30, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10086 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Tryon v. Town of North Branford
755 A.2d 317 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)