HORRY v. Woodbury

673 S.E.2d 127

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in HORRY v. Woodbury. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 N.C. 7 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 6, 2009·No. 198A08·Published

Opinion

673 S.E.2d 127 (2009)

Joseph HORRY, Jr.
v.
David H. WOODBURY, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Ruth N. Horry.

No. 198A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2009.

Brady, Nordgren, Morton & Malone, PLLC, by Travis K. Morton, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hedrick Murray Bryson Kennett Mauch & Connor, PLLC, by Josiah S. Murray, III, Durham, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

673 S.E.2d 127 (2009)

Joseph HORRY, Jr.
v.
David H. WOODBURY, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Ruth N. Horry.

No. 198A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2009.

Brady, Nordgren, Morton & Malone, PLLC, by Travis K. Morton, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hedrick Murray Bryson Kennett Mauch & Connor, PLLC, by Josiah S. Murray, III, Durham, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

HORRY v. Woodbury, 673 S.E.2d 127 (N.C. 2009).

Pincite

673 S.E.2d 127 (HORRY v. Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.