Horrigths v. Troesch

Appellate Court of Illinois

Horrigths v. Troesch

201 Ill. App. 433

DecidedJune 10, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ill. App. 433 (Horrigths v. Troesch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horrigths v. Troesch, 201 Ill. App. 433 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Intoxicating liquors, § 247*—when death of person due to intoxication of another is question for jury. In an action by a wife under the Dramshop Act, sec. 9 (J. & A. ¶ 4609), for injury to her means of support, resulting from her husband having been killed by one to whom the defendant saloon keeper had sold intoxicating liquor, held that the question - whether the intoxication was the proximate cause of the killing was for the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Intoxicating liquors, § 247*—when death of person due to intoxication of another is question for jury. In an action by a wife under the Dramshop Act, sec. 9 (J. & A. ¶ 4609), for injury to her means of support, resulting from her husband having been killed by one to whom the defendant saloon keeper had sold intoxicating liquor, held that the question - whether the intoxication was the proximate cause of the killing was for the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ill. App. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horrigths-v-troesch-illappct-1916.