Horrigan Contracting Co. v. Columbia Insurance

89 A. 210, 27 Del. 454, 4 Boyce 454, 1913 Del. LEXIS 67
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 6, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 A. 210 (Horrigan Contracting Co. v. Columbia Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horrigan Contracting Co. v. Columbia Insurance, 89 A. 210, 27 Del. 454, 4 Boyce 454, 1913 Del. LEXIS 67 (Del. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

This return shows an attempted service upon the insurance [457]*457commissioner by leaving a copy, and we think that inasmuch as an alternative service is provided for in the statute, a service by leaving a copy would not be a legal service. The statute expressly provides how service shall be made in the absence of the insurance commissioner, and that is, upon some person in the office designated by the commissioner. Upon such person process may be served, and manifestly the statute means that it shall be personal service. Moreover, service by copy can only be made by authority of statute, and no such authority is given expressly or by implication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A. 210, 27 Del. 454, 4 Boyce 454, 1913 Del. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horrigan-contracting-co-v-columbia-insurance-delsuperct-1913.