Horrell v. Reeves

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Horrell v. Reeves

72 Pa. Super. 129, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 17, 1919·No. Appeal, No. 61·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Oklady, P. J.,

The only assignment of error presented for our consideration is, that the court erred in overruling a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto on a verdict found in favor of the defendants.

The charge of the court and the opinion filed in refusing the defendants’ motion furnish a conclusive answer to the argument presented by the appellant. On the trial the plaintiff presented a point asking for binding instructions in his favor, which was refused and the disputed questions of fact were fairly submitted in an adequate charge. The verdict returned was fully warranted by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oklady, P. J.,

The only assignment of error presented for our consideration is, that the court erred in overruling a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto on a verdict found in favor of the defendants.

The charge of the court and the opinion filed in refusing the defendants’ motion furnish a conclusive answer to the argument presented by the appellant. On the trial the plaintiff presented a point asking for binding instructions in his favor, which was refused and the disputed questions of fact were fairly submitted in an adequate charge. The verdict returned was fully warranted by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Horrell v. Reeves, 72 Pa. Super. 129, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

72 Pa. Super. 129 (Horrell v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related