Horrell v. Reeves

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Horrell v. Reeves

72 Pa. Super. 129, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 17, 1919

DocketAppeal, No. 61

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 72 Pa. Super. 129 (Horrell v. Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horrell v. Reeves, 72 Pa. Super. 129, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oklady, P. J.,

The only assignment of error presented for our consideration is, that the court erred in overruling a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto on a verdict found in favor of the defendants.

The charge of the court and the opinion filed in refusing the defendants’ motion furnish a conclusive answer to the argument presented by the appellant. On the trial the plaintiff presented a point asking for binding instructions in his favor, which was refused and the disputed questions of fact were fairly submitted in an adequate charge. The verdict returned was fully warranted by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI