Horrall v. Mattingley

Indiana Supreme Court

Horrall v. Mattingley

27 Ind. 500

DecidedMay 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Ind. 500 (Horrall v. Mattingley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horrall v. Mattingley, 27 Ind. 500 (Ind. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, C. J.

The' appellees were undertakers, and filed a claim in the Court of Common Pleas against the estate of [501]*501Elvira Horrall, deceased, for a coffin, &c., furnished for her. The appellant was the administrator of the estate. On the final hearing, the court rendered a personal judgment against the appellant.

J. W. Burton, for appellant. S. II. Taylor, for appellee.

The case is precisely the same,.in every other respect, as that of Horrall v. Saulder, ante p. 499, and for the reasons given in that case, the judgment in this is reversed, with costs, and a similar judgment ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, C. J.

The' appellees were undertakers, and filed a claim in the Court of Common Pleas against the estate of [501]*501Elvira Horrall, deceased, for a coffin, &c., furnished for her. The appellant was the administrator of the estate. On the final hearing, the court rendered a personal judgment against the appellant.

J. W. Burton, for appellant. S. II. Taylor, for appellee.

The case is precisely the same,.in every other respect, as that of Horrall v. Saulder, ante p. 499, and for the reasons given in that case, the judgment in this is reversed, with costs, and a similar judgment ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Ind. 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horrall-v-mattingley-ind-1867.