Horr v. Wessels
This text of 253 A.D. 754 (Horr v. Wessels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a nuisance created by the negligent construction of a sidewalk by defendants, order granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike out as sham and frivolous, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, certain parts of the defense contained in the fourth paragraph of the answer, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 754, 1 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horr-v-wessels-nyappdiv-1937.