Horowitz v. Smith
This text of 35 Misc. 829 (Horowitz v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A review of the testimony shows that the court below, upon conflicting evidence as to the status and authority of Skinner, found in favor of the defendant. That conclusion necessarily resulted in a judgment for the defendant, and we are disinclined to disturb it, in face of the conflict in the proofs.
Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 829, 72 N.Y.S. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-smith-nyappterm-1901.