Horowitz v. Raynor
This text of 603 So. 2d 45 (Horowitz v. Raynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court found appellant was the prevailing party, and indeed he was, having recovered a net judgment in his favor. See Malagon v. Solari, 566 So.2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Pappert v. Mobilinium Assocs. V., 512 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Since the contracts under which suit was brought expressly provided for the prevailing party to be awarded his attorney’s fees, it was error to ignore the contractual provision. See Lakewood on the Green Villas Ass’n v. Pomerantz, 556 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Blue Lakes Apts. v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We therefore reverse and remand to the trial court to award attorney’s fees to appellant.
We affirm with respect to the issues on cross appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
603 So. 2d 45, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8111, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-raynor-fladistctapp-1992.