Horowitz v. Kushner & Pines, Inc.
181 Misc. 10, 46 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2769
This text of 181 Misc. 10 (Horowitz v. Kushner & Pines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Horowitz v. Kushner & Pines, Inc., 181 Misc. 10, 46 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
Memorandum
Plaintiff’s error in practice by failing to make a separate demand for jury trial was not curable by the nunc pro tune order appealed from.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Hammer, Schmuck and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 Misc. 10, 46 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-kushner-pines-inc-nyappterm-1943.