Horowitz v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn
545 N.E.2d 631, 74 N.Y.2d 835, 546 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2892
This text of 545 N.E.2d 631 (Horowitz v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Horowitz v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn, 545 N.E.2d 631, 74 N.Y.2d 835, 546 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2892 (N.Y. 1989).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [iü]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
545 N.E.2d 631, 74 N.Y.2d 835, 546 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-incorporated-village-of-roslyn-ny-1989.