Horowitz v. Horowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Horowitz v. Horowitz

10 A.D.2d 887, 201 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 887 (Horowitz v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horowitz v. Horowitz, 10 A.D.2d 887, 201 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a wife for a separation on the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, the husband appeals: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, made November 24, 1958, after trial, granting the wife a separation, alimony and counsel fee; and (2) from the court’s denial of a motion made during the trial to dismiss the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from the denial of the motion to dismiss the complaint, dismissed, without costs. No separate appeal lies from a ruling made during the course of a trial, which was reviewed upon the appeal from the judgment. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a wife for a separation on the grounds of cruelty and nonsupport, the husband appeals: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, made November 24, 1958, after trial, granting the wife a separation, alimony and counsel fee; and (2) from the court’s denial of a motion made during the trial to dismiss the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from the denial of the motion to dismiss the complaint, dismissed, without costs. No separate appeal lies from a ruling made during the course of a trial, which was reviewed upon the appeal from the judgment. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 887, 201 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-horowitz-nyappdiv-1960.