Horowitz v. Horowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Horowitz v. Horowitz

5 A.D.2d 998, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6303

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 998 (Horowitz v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horowitz v. Horowitz, 5 A.D.2d 998, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6303 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a judgment declaring that appellant Zaeharias was duly elected as an officer of a local union at its general 'biennial election held on May 15, 1956, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment, entered after trial, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a judgment declaring that appellant Zaeharias was duly elected as an officer of a local union at its general 'biennial election held on May 15, 1956, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment, entered after trial, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 998, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-horowitz-nyappdiv-1958.