Horowitz v. Home Title Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Horowitz v. Home Title Insurance

258 A.D. 901, 16 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 901 (Horowitz v. Home Title Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horowitz v. Home Title Insurance, 258 A.D. 901, 16 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Actions to recover for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff and for loss of services by his father. The infant plaintiff, a four-year old boy, was injured while playing on an iron flower urn in the front yard of premises next to his home. The boy’s grandfather had been authorized by the defendants to try to obtain a tenant for the premises. The grandfather instructed the boy to play in the yard where the urn was situated while prospective tenants were being shown through the house. The defendants are assignees of the rents of the premises and presumably in control thereof. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ ease unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Actions to recover for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff and for loss of services by his father. The infant plaintiff, a four-year old boy, was injured while playing on an iron flower urn in the front yard of premises next to his home. The boy’s grandfather had been authorized by the defendants to try to obtain a tenant for the premises. The grandfather instructed the boy to play in the yard where the urn was situated while prospective tenants were being shown through the house. The defendants are assignees of the rents of the premises and presumably in control thereof. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ ease unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 901, 16 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-v-home-title-insurance-nyappdiv-1939.