Horowitz v. Harris
129 Misc. 236, 221 N.Y.S. 185, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 702
Opinions
The complaint in the prior action did not allege facts warranting the imprisonment of the plaintiff’s husband under body execution. (Segelken v. Meyer, 94 N. Y. 473; Lange v. Schile, 111 App. Div. 613; All-Package G. Stores Co. v. McAtamney, 174 id. 778.)
Delehanty and Lydon, JJ., concur; Levy, J., dissents, with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horowitz v. Harris, 129 Misc. 236, 221 N.Y.S. 185, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 702 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1927).
129 Misc. 236 (Horowitz v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Segelken v. . Meyer
94 N.Y. 473 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Moffatt v. . Fulton
30 N.E. 992 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Lange v. Schile
111 A.D. 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
All-Package Grocery Stores Co. v. McAtamney
174 A.D. 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Vandeweghe v. Schwartz
187 A.D. 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)