Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co.

18 Misc. 728, 41 N.Y.S. 1118, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 1490
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Misc. 24
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 15, 1896·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

We consider that the point in respect to which the justices of this term differed, viz., whether the question of permanent injuries- should have been submitted to the jury in. the absence of the evidence of medical experts; is of sufficient importance to justify the granting of the motion.

Motion granted' upon condition that the appellant files a stipulation that for the purpose of such appeal it will waive all objections to the judgment except those which raised that point.

Present: Daly, P. J., MoAdam and Bischoff, JJ.

Motion granted;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co., 18 Misc. 728, 41 N.Y.S. 1118, 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 1490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

18 Misc. 728 (Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.