Horowitz v. Emerald Nutraceuticals, LLC.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

LEONARD G. HOROWITZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-696-SPC-NPM

EMERALD NUTRACEUTICALS, LLC., MICHAEL GARCIA, JOEL ZUPNICK, CHESKEL ZUPNICK, SPECIALTYRX, INC., STEVENS ADONIS and DOES 1-50,

Defendants. / ORDER This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the file. Last month, the Court dismissed without prejudice the Complaint as a shotgun pleading and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 6). But it gave pro se Plaintiff Leonard Horowitz until November 29, 2023, to file an amended complaint. In doing so, the Court warned Plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint may cause the case to be closed without further notice. But the November 29 deadline has come and gone with no filing. So the Court’s Order becomes a final judgment, and the case is closed. Auto. Alignment & Body Servs., Inc. v. State Farm, 953 F.3d 707, 719-20 (11th Cir. 2020) (The “order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend within a specified time becomes a final judgment if the time allowed for amendment expires.”). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to deny any motions as moot, terminate any deadlines, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this December 4, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record