Horowitz Bros. & Margareten v. Safier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Horowitz Bros. & Margareten v. Safier

40 A.D.2d 992, 338 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 992 (Horowitz Bros. & Margareten v. Safier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horowitz Bros. & Margareten v. Safier, 40 A.D.2d 992, 338 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a balance due for goods sold and delivered, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 1972, as denied its motion (1) to examine before trial E. & J. Distributors, Inc., a nonparty corporation, as a witness and (2) for discovery and inspection of said corporation’s books and records. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The examination before trial and the discovery and inspection shall proceed at Special Term, Part II, in Queens County, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff. In our opinion, special circumstances exist and therefore plaintiff’s motion should have been granted. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a balance due for goods sold and delivered, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 1972, as denied its motion (1) to examine before trial E. & J. Distributors, Inc., a nonparty corporation, as a witness and (2) for discovery and inspection of said corporation’s books and records. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The examination before trial and the discovery and inspection shall proceed at Special Term, Part II, in Queens County, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiff. In our opinion, special circumstances exist and therefore plaintiff’s motion should have been granted. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 992, 338 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horowitz-bros-margareten-v-safier-nyappdiv-1972.