Horovitz v. Louis Fagnant, Inc.

201 A.D. 856

Opinion

Order reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate the previous order denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon delivery of the deed by the referee in foreclosure to the purchasers they became entitled to possession of the premises. (Kilpatrick v. Argyle Co., Inc., 199 App. Div. 753. See, also, section 1675 of the Code, now section 985 of the Civil Practice Act; sections 1632 and 1671 of the Code, now sections 1085 and 121 of the Civil Practice Act.) Blackmar, P. J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horovitz v. Louis Fagnant, Inc., 201 A.D. 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

201 A.D. 856 (Horovitz v. Louis Fagnant, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kilpatrick v. Argyle Co.
199 A.D. 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)