Hornung v. Louisville Trust Co.

Sixth Circuit

Hornung v. Louisville Trust Co.

86 F.2d 1002, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3937

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 1936

DocketNo. 7052

StatusPublished

This text of 86 F.2d 1002 (Hornung v. Louisville Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hornung v. Louisville Trust Co., 86 F.2d 1002, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3937 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the briefs and record and argument of counsel; and, it appearing that the parties are all citizens of Kentucky, and that the bill in equity as amended involves solely the alleged rights of the appellants under Kentucky statutes and under the Kentucky Constitution, the order of the District Court dismissing the bill as amended is hereby affirmed. Reese v. Louisville Trust Co., 58 F. (2d) 638 (C.C.A.6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the briefs and record and argument of counsel; and, it appearing that the parties are all citizens of Kentucky, and that the bill in equity as amended involves solely the alleged rights of the appellants under Kentucky statutes and under the Kentucky Constitution, the order of the District Court dismissing the bill as amended is hereby affirmed. Reese v. Louisville Trust Co., 58 F. (2d) 638 (C.C.A.6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 F.2d 1002, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hornung-v-louisville-trust-co-ca6-1936.