Hornstein v. Barry

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Hornstein v. Barry

537 A.2d 1131, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 44, 1988 WL 13484

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 19, 1988

DocketNo. 83-242

StatusPublished

This text of 537 A.2d 1131 (Hornstein v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hornstein v. Barry, 537 A.2d 1131, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 44, 1988 WL 13484 (D.C. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division ’ that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of September 11,1987, 530 A.2d 1177, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 29, 1988.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI