Hornstein v. Barry

537 A.2d 1131, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 44, 1988 WL 13484
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 1988·No. No. 83-242·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division ’ that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of September 11,1987, 530 A.2d 1177, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 29, 1988.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hornstein v. Barry, 537 A.2d 1131, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 44, 1988 WL 13484 (D.C. 1988).

537 A.2d 1131 (Hornstein v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hornstein v. Barry
530 A.2d 1177 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)