Hornsby v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Hornsby v. State

200 So. 541, 146 Fla. 23, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1065

DecidedFebruary 4, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 541 (Hornsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hornsby v. State, 200 So. 541, 146 Fla. 23, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1065 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be—

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Terrell and Adams, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be—

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Terrell and Adams, J. J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 541, 146 Fla. 23, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hornsby-v-state-fla-1941.