Hornsby v. Miller Long Co., Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedNovember 29, 2000
DocketI.C. No. 693807
StatusPublished

This text of Hornsby v. Miller Long Co., Inc. (Hornsby v. Miller Long Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hornsby v. Miller Long Co., Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Opinion

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Pamela T. Young and the briefs and oral arguments on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or to amend the holding of the Deputy Commissioner. Accordingly, the Full Commission Affirms the Deputy Commissioners decision and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties at the hearing on 20 July 1998 as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act.

2. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff-employee and defendant-employer at all relevant times herein.

3. Hartford Specialty Risk Services, Inc. was the carrier on the risk at all relevant times herein.

4. Plaintiffs average weekly wage was $518.35, yielding a compensation rate of $345.74.

5. The parties stipulated to plaintiffs medical records from Western Wake Medical Center, Wake Neurology Associates, Inc., Raleigh Neurosurgical Clinic, Inc., Dr. David Ciliberto, Dr. Edward Mulcahy, Dr. Robert Kimber, Rex Hospital, Rehab Management Systems, Wake Medical Center, and Central Carolina Hospital.

6. The issues presented are:

a) Whether plaintiff is entitled to future medical expenses related to the injury by accident which he sustained while working for defendant-employer on 31 January 1997?

b) Whether plaintiff is entitled to continuing medical benefits for treatment of the injuries he sustained while working for defendant-employer on 31 January 1997?

c) Whether plaintiff is entitled to any other benefits under the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act?

***********
Based upon the entire evidence of record, the Full Commission finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing on 20 July 1998, plaintiff was a 40 year old high school graduate. Plaintiff is right hand dominant.

2. Plaintiff had been employed for years in the construction industry working as a form carpenter and performing other types of construction work. On 31 January 1997, plaintiff was 5 6 tall and weighed 275 pounds.

3. On 31 January 1997, plaintiff was working as a form carpenter on a project for defendant-employer remodeling Kenan Stadium in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Plaintiff was working on the ground level when some workers more than 20 feet above him shouted that they were dropping a piece of plywood. Plaintiff lunged as a 4 x 8 sheet of plywood fell in the area where he was working. The plywood bounced and hit him squarely in the back, forcing him to the ground and jamming the full weight of his body and tool belt onto his outstretched arms and hands.

4. Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury by accident to his neck arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant-employer and as a direct result of a specific traumatic incident of the work assigned on 31 January 1997.

5. On the night of the accident, plaintiff was in intense pain. The next morning, plaintiff presented to the emergency room at Western Wake Medical Center and reported pain in his neck and back and numbness and tingling in his hands, particularly in his right hand.

6. Before the date of the accident, plaintiff had never before had problems with pain, numbness or tingling in his hands.

7. On 6 February 1997, plaintiff was referred to Dr. Stephen Gupton, a neurologist. Plaintiff presented to Dr. Gupton and reported that his neck was hurting and that his fingers were numb. Dr. Guptons initial diagnosis was a possible acute central cord contusion and a bruise of the right flank area.

8. On 11 February 1997, plaintiff was admitted to Wake Medical Center for a myelogram and MRI. The cervical myelogram revealed minimal ventral impressions at several levels. The MRI could not be completed because of plaintiffs claustrophobia.

9. On 12 February 1997, nerve conduction studies demonstrated bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Dr. Gupton referred plaintiff to Dr. Stephen C. Boone, a neurologist.

10. On 25 February 1997, plaintiff continued to have problems with his right wrist and after his one and only visit to Dr. Boone, Dr. Boone prescribed plaintiff a wrist splint and pain medication.

11. On 17 March 1997, plaintiff presented to the emergency room at Carolina Hospital due to continued hand pain. Dr. Thomas G. Fulghum prescribed a wrist splint for night wear and physical therapy. Plaintiff called Dr. Guptons office and informed him of his trip to the emergency room.

12. Plaintiff began physical therapy and noted to his physical therapist that he was having trouble sleeping and was continuing to have hand pain.

13. On 24 March 1997, plaintiff presented to Dr. Edward Mulcahy, an orthopedist, for a second opinion. Plaintiff reported neck pain and pain radiating into both arms with numbness in the third and fourth fingers on his right hand and occasionally in his left hand. Dr. Mulcahy found a positive Tinel sign bilaterally with the exception of increased parasthesis in the third and fourth fingers of the right hand. Dr. Mulcahy diagnosed plaintiff as suffering from a cervical strain with bilateral radiculopathy related to plaintiffs 31 January 1997 injury by accident. Dr. Mulcahy took plaintiff out of work.

14. Plaintiff continued to have physical therapy during the spring of 1997 and was given some relief from his pain by being placed in traction on his neck. On 17 April 1997, plaintiff had an MRI scan at which revealed minimal covertebral ridges between the C3 and C7 vertebrae.

15. On 23 April 1997 and 29 April 1997, plaintiff again presented to the emergency room at Central Carolina Hospital because of the pain in his hands.

16. On 29 April 1997, plaintiff presented to Dr. Laura Josewicz, a neurologist. Dr. Josewicz noted that plaintiff had weakness in his muscle grip bilaterally and tentatively diagnosed plaintiff with cervical spondylosis.

17. On 29 May 1997, Dr. Josewicz performed nerve conduction studies showing significant prolonged sensory latencies, sensory palmer latencies, absent digital latencies, and reduced sensory nerve action. Dr. Josewicz diagnosed plaintiff with severe bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.

18. The competent medical evidence in the record establishes that plaintiff has reached the end of his healing period with regards to his neck.

19. Drs. Gupton, Josewicz, Boone, and Mulcahy all agree that plaintiff had contracted carpal tunnel syndrome from a previous occupation. Dr. Gupton opined that plaintiffs fall on 31 January 1997 may have precipitated symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Dr. Josewicz opined that plaintiffs carpal tunnel syndrome was asymptomatic until the trauma he suffered on 31 January 1997.

20. Notwithstanding the fact that Dr. Ciliberto, a neurologist and partner of Dr. Mulcahy, rendered two different opinions regarding the causation of plaintiffs carpal tunnel syndrome, and even though Dr. Boone opined that plaintiffs carpal tunnel syndrome was not caused by his accident at work, Drs. Josewicz and Mulcahy opined that plaintiffs fall at work on 31 January 1997 caused plaintiff to become symptomatic.

21. Drs. Ciliberto and Mulcahy treated plaintiff from May of 1997 through April of 1998 and opined that during this time plaintiffs carpal tunnel syndrome condition failed to improve. Consequently, Drs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hornsby v. Miller Long Co., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hornsby-v-miller-long-co-inc-ncworkcompcom-2000.