Horns, Inc. v. Marzano

40 A.D.3d 503, 834 N.Y.S.2d 858
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered November 2, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ cross motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ attorneys, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants failed to sustain their burden of proving that counsel’s testimony was “necessary” (see S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437 [1987]), or that it would be adverse to plaintiffs (Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v 2 Broadway, 279 AD2d 315, 316 [2001]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Sweeny, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horns, Inc. v. Marzano, 40 A.D.3d 503, 834 N.Y.S.2d 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

40 A.D.3d 503 (Horns, Inc. v. Marzano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. Beth Abraham Nursing Home
209 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)