Horns, Inc. v. Marzano

40 A.D.3d 503, 834 N.Y.S.2d 858
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 29, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.D.3d 503 (Horns, Inc. v. Marzano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horns, Inc. v. Marzano, 40 A.D.3d 503, 834 N.Y.S.2d 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered November 2, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ cross motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ attorneys, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants failed to sustain their burden of proving that counsel’s testimony was “necessary” (see S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437 [1987]), or that it would be adverse to plaintiffs (Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v 2 Broadway, 279 AD2d 315, 316 [2001]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Sweeny, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. Beth Abraham Nursing Home
209 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 503, 834 N.Y.S.2d 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horns-inc-v-marzano-nyappdiv-2007.