Hornreich v. Hornreich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hornreich v. Hornreich

26 A.D.2d 942, 275 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3103

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 942 (Hornreich v. Hornreich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hornreich v. Hornreich, 26 A.D.2d 942, 275 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 12, 1966, which awarded the wife temporary alimony (including payment of apartment rents) and counsel fees. Order modified by reducing the amount awarded for alimony from $60 per week to $30 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the circumstances presented, considering the rental allowance made and the amount of defendant’s money appropriated by plaintiff, the temporary weekly alimony should be reduced to the amount indicated. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 12, 1966, which awarded the wife temporary alimony (including payment of apartment rents) and counsel fees. Order modified by reducing the amount awarded for alimony from $60 per week to $30 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the circumstances presented, considering the rental allowance made and the amount of defendant’s money appropriated by plaintiff, the temporary weekly alimony should be reduced to the amount indicated. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 942, 275 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hornreich-v-hornreich-nyappdiv-1966.