Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co.

54 N.W. 105, 84 Wis. 71, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 22
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 1893·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lyom, C. J.

The errors in entering up judgment on the note and warrant of attorney are not jurisdictional, but only irregularities, not affecting the jurisdiction of the court to render the judgment. The petitioner has failed to show any equitable grounds entitling him to be relieved therefrom or from the execution. The case is not distinguishable from that of Marshall & I. Bank v. Milwaukee Worsted Mills, ante, p. 23, and hence is ruled by it.

By the Court.— Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co., 54 N.W. 105, 84 Wis. 71, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 22 (Wis. 1893).

54 N.W. 105 (Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Husman v. Miller
27 N.W.2d 731 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1947)
Reeves v. Kroll
113 N.W. 440 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
John V. Farwell Co. v. Hilbert
30 L.R.A. 235 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1895)
F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. v. Falk
61 N.W. 562 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1895)