Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co.

54 N.W. 105, 84 Wis. 71, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 22

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 10, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 N.W. 105 (Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horning v. E. Griesbach Brewing Co., 54 N.W. 105, 84 Wis. 71, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 22 (Wis. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Lyom, C. J.

The errors in entering up judgment on the note and warrant of attorney are not jurisdictional, but only irregularities, not affecting the jurisdiction of the court to render the judgment. The petitioner has failed to show any equitable grounds entitling him to be relieved therefrom or from the execution. The case is not distinguishable from that of Marshall & I. Bank v. Milwaukee Worsted Mills, ante, p. 23, and hence is ruled by it.

By the Court.— Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyom, C. J.

The errors in entering up judgment on the note and warrant of attorney are not jurisdictional, but only irregularities, not affecting the jurisdiction of the court to render the judgment. The petitioner has failed to show any equitable grounds entitling him to be relieved therefrom or from the execution. The case is not distinguishable from that of Marshall & I. Bank v. Milwaukee Worsted Mills, ante, p. 23, and hence is ruled by it.

By the Court.— Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 N.W. 105, 84 Wis. 71, 1893 Wisc. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horning-v-e-griesbach-brewing-co-wis-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack