Horner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Horner v. State

149 S.W.2d 586

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 9, 1941

DocketNo. 21600

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.W.2d 586 (Horner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horner v. State, 149 S.W.2d 586 (Tex. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Bethel Horner, C. R. Graham, and Adeline Graham were- jointly charged and prosecuted for the theft of an automobile of the value of less than fifty dollars. Upon conviction, Adeline Graham’s punishment was assessed at sixty days’ confinement in the county jail, and the punishment of Bethel Horner and C. R. Graham was fixed for each at one year’s confinement in the county jail. Only the two last named appealed.

Each of them has now filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not desire to further prosecute said appeal, and upon their request the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Bethel Horner, C. R. Graham, and Adeline Graham were- jointly charged and prosecuted for the theft of an automobile of the value of less than fifty dollars. Upon conviction, Adeline Graham’s punishment was assessed at sixty days’ confinement in the county jail, and the punishment of Bethel Horner and C. R. Graham was fixed for each at one year’s confinement in the county jail. Only the two last named appealed.

Each of them has now filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not desire to further prosecute said appeal, and upon their request the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W.2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horner-v-state-texcrimapp-1941.