Horner v. Pilkington

11 Ind. 357
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horner v. Pilkington. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Ind. 440
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 1859·Published

Opinion

Suit by the appellee against the appellant on two notes, and judgment by default.

Process appears to have been duly served on the defendant, and the proceedings appear to have been regular. We see no error whatever in the case; but if there had been, it [440] has already been decided by this Court that a motion to set aside the default should have preceded an appeal to this Court, in order to present for the decision of this Court any question arising on the record. Blair v. Davis, 9 Ind. 236.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent. damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horner v. Pilkington, 11 Ind. 357 (Ind. 1859).

11 Ind. 357 (Horner v. Pilkington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blair v. Davis
9 Ind. 236 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1857)