Horner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

89 S.E.2d 212, 92 Ga. App. 569, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 645
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 1955
Docket35735
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E.2d 212 (Horner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 89 S.E.2d 212, 92 Ga. App. 569, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

1. In a workmen’s compensation proceeding the burden is upon the claimant to establish by evidence that the employee has sustained an accidental injury such as is contemplated by the act. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. v. Harden, 64 Ga. App. 593 (13 S. E. 2d 685); Shelby Mutual Casualty Co. v. Huff, 87 Ga. App. 463 (74 S. E. 2d 251).

2. “Where there is no evidence as to the, cause of death of an employee who collapses and almost immediately dies while engaged in the course of his normal and daily employment, there is nothing upon which a finding of fact that such employee sustained an ‘accident arising out of’ his employment may be predicated.” Shelby Mutual Casualty Co. v. Huff, supra.

3. The trial court did not err in affirming the finding of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation that the evidence did not show that the deceased died as the result of an “accident arising out of” his employment.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

[571]*571Assuming but not deciding that the deposition of Dr. Roy H. McClung is admissible, it has no probative value, for the hypothetical question propounded to him was based .partly on facts not presented in evidence at the hearing.

The award of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation was that the claimant did not prove the cause of death, did not prove an accident, and therefore did not prove a causal connection between an accident and injury and the death of the employee. This finding was affirmed on appeal by the Judge of the Superior Court of Lowndes County. To this judgment the claimant excepts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. King
121 S.E.2d 336 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E.2d 212, 92 Ga. App. 569, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horner-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-gactapp-1955.