Horner v. Harrison

37 Iowa 378
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Miller, J.

The petition alleges the execution of the bond by the defendants, notices the conditions, to wit, that they (defendants) would pay all damages which the plaintiff might sustain by reason of the wrongful suing out of the writ of attachment; and alleges that the attachment was wrongfully sued out. It fails, however, to allege any breach in the conditions of the bond; it does not allege the nonpayment of the [379] damages which the plaintiff avers she has sustained. This averment is necessary under section 2960 of the Revision. This court so held in Ryder v. Thomas, 32 Iowa, 56. The demurrer should have been sustained.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horner v. Harrison, 37 Iowa 378 (iowa 1873).

37 Iowa 378 (Horner v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Rife v. Reynolds
117 S.W. 653 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)
Knapp & Spalding Co. v. Barnard & Co.
43 N.W. 197 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)
Hencke v. Johnson
17 N.W. 766 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1883)