Horner v. Harrison
This text of 37 Iowa 378 (Horner v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition alleges the execution of the bond by the defendants, notices the conditions, to wit, that they (defendants) would pay all damages which the plaintiff might sustain by reason of the wrongful suing out of the writ of attachment; and alleges that the attachment was wrongfully sued out. It fails, however, to allege any breach in the conditions of the bond; it does not allege the nonpayment of the [379]*379damages which the plaintiff avers she has sustained. This averment is necessary under section 2960 of the Revision. This court so held in Ryder v. Thomas, 32 Iowa, 56. The demurrer should have been sustained.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Iowa 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horner-v-harrison-iowa-1873.